雅思动物（1）

vivisection 活体解剖

experiments on animals 在动物身上做试验

test animals 用于实验的动物

be subjected to experiments 被迫接受试验

animal rights 动物权利

clinical research 临床研究

cruel 残忍的

extremist 极端主义者

medical research 医学研究

origin of species 物种起源

雅思动物（2）

alternative method 替代的方法

biological diversity 生物多样性

natural balance 自然平衡

equilibrium of ecosystem 生态平衡

coexistence 共存

endangered animals 濒危动物

diversity of species 物种多样性

shameless 令人羞愧的

barbaric 野蛮的

live and let live 活着就是与万物共存

雅思动物（3）

meaningless 没有意义的

dominant species 优势物种

laboratory 实验室

vaccine 疫苗

infringement 践踏

right to live 生存权

torture 折磨

anti-science 反科学的

life-threatening diseases 危及生命的疾病

scientific gains 科学成果

雅思动物（4）

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of To what extent do you agree or disagree?

第一个步骤是决定同不同意，还是部分同意。我的建议是完全不同意。我不认为这个题目我们可以选部分同意。

接下来，让我们组织一下四段的内容：

开头段： 题目复述(保护动物正确的)，然后回答问题(完全不同意)

第一段理由：为什么不同意。比如说保护动物是我们的责任,动物有生活在地球上的权利

第二段理由： 为什么不同意。比如说我们用很多资源去保护动物，但这并不算浪费资源

总结段: 重复观点/总结我们的答案

接下来是最重要的了：论点。你能想想第二段第三段我们能列举哪些论据吗?

给你一个开头段的范例：

开头段(话题+一般性答案)

Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for I completely disagree with this point of

总结段(重申我们的答案)

In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect

请注意:

开头段和总结段要短小精悍，直截了当。如果你要得高分，要在主体段两段下功夫。

下面是9分范文：

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century,so protecting them is a waste of what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for I completely disagree with this point of

In my opinion,it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world`s There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our

I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on

In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect