记一次辩论会

今天在我们班开了一次别开生面的辩论会，同学们发言踊跃，气氛非常热烈。

today, a new debate was held in our class. the students spoke enthusiastically and the atmosphere was very warm.

我们以“开卷有益”和“开卷未必有益”为题，进行辩论。同学们个个巧舌如簧，你来说，我来辩，都互不相让，“杨可！“老师叫道我，因为我是支持“开卷有益”的正方，我是这样说的：“我认为开卷有益，因为我们可以从某些书籍中学会并懂得一些知识，例如：“十万个为什么”“天文小百科”等……

we have a debate on the topics of "opening a book is beneficial" and "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial". all the students have a good tongue. as for you, i'll argue with each other. they can't let each other, "yang ke! "the teacher called me, because i am the right side of supporting" open book is beneficial ", i said:" i think open book is beneficial, because we can learn and understand some knowledge from some books, such as: "100000 why", "astronomy encyclopedia" and so on

我讲完之后，正方的同学们给予了我非常热烈的掌声，我坐下来，暗喜没人反驳，突然，就来了这么一位“不速之客”，“小乌龟”――尹依然。天呐，怎么老天给我找了一个“女强人”？看来，这次辩论会反方是赢定了，喂？我们正方的主力中心怎么没举手，“程九程，你怎么不举手呢？你写的很好呀！”我们正方的同学叫他。嘻，你看到这一定心里有了疑问，为什么有人叫“aba”式的名字。其实，他并不叫程九程，而是叫程九铭，程九程是四年级下学期，一节音乐课上，音乐老师叫错了程九铭的名字，我们把这个老师给他起的名字叫成他的外号，叫顺口了，就一直叫这个名字了。

after i finished speaking, the students of zhengfang gave me a very warm applause. i sat down and secretly liked that no one contradicted me. suddenly, there came such an "unexpected guest", "little turtle" - yin is still there. god, why did god find me a "strong woman"？ it seems that the opposite side of this debate is sure to win. hello？ why didn't our main force center raise its hand？ "cheng jiucheng, why didn't you raise your hand？"？ you write very well! " he is the name of our classmate. hee, you must have a question in your mind when you see it. why is someone called "aba" type name. in fact, his name is not cheng jiucheng, but cheng jiuming. cheng jiucheng is in the next semester of the fourth grade. in a music class, the music teacher called cheng jiuming by the wrong name. we call the name given to him by the teacher as his nickname, shunkou, and it's the same name all the time.

辩论会就要结束时，老师告诉我们正方的反方都不完全对，有的书可以看，是好书，但也有某种书会让青少年误入歧途。所以双方都不完全对。开完今天的辩论会，我明白了：“要读好书，不要什么都读。”

at the end of the debate, the teacher told us that neither the right side nor the wrong side is completely right. some books can be read and are good, but some books can lead young people astray. so neither side is completely right. after today's debate, i understood: "read good books, not everything."